Biography

Fletcher is an advocate with 30 years’ experience in criminal, regulatory, civil and public law litigation. He has extensive court experience at every level having conducted many jury and judge alone trials, appeals, tribunal and inquiry proceedings.

His expertise spans a wide range of enforcement actions including: fraud; financial market; fair trading; and other serious financial crime; overseas investment; aviation and maritime regulation; workplace health and safety; resource management; fisheries; and animal welfare; as well as regularly conducting serious general criminal law cases.

He represents and provides advice to a wide range of private and corporate clients who are subject to investigation and enforcement action by diverse Government agencies; or are challenging public agency actions and decision making.  He also accepts instructions to act in civil proceedings including resource management appeals to the Environment Court; judicial review proceedings, professional disciplinary proceedings, and coronial inquests.

Fletcher qualified as a Barrister and Solicitor in New Zealand in 1995. He was admitted as a Barrister and Solicitor of the Supreme Court of the Pitcairn Islands in 2003. He is presently a Senior Magistrate of the Pitcairn Islands.

He commenced his career in London in 1996, after which he returned to New Zealand in 1998 to work as a Crown Prosecutor.  He was appointed Crown Solicitor for Rotorua in 2006. During that time, he appeared as lead prosecuting counsel in many serious and notorious criminal and regulatory trials.

He joined the independent bar in 2014 and was appointed King‘s Counsel in 2021.  He is ranked in Chambers and Partners as a white-collar specialist.

Recent Experience

Sealink Travel Group Limited v District Court at Auckland [2025] NZHC 3508

Successful judicial review the District Court amending a criminal health and safety charge to substitute the applicant for a different corporate defendant who had been wrongly charged.

 

R v Pikia [2024] NZCA 408

Acted for the defendant/appellant in challenging the unlawful excise of search powers by the Serious Fraud Office.  The Court of Appeal ruled that over 147 search warrants and notices used by the SFO were unlawful.  Following judgement the Serious Fraud Office abandoned the prosecution.  The judgment has led to challenges in other cases being upheld, and evidence excluded.

 

Maritime New Zealand v Goodhew [2024] NZDC 12301

Successfully defended both the skipper and his company against health and safety charges brought by MNZ following the capsize and destruction of the MV Enchanter on her transit from the Three Kings to the North Cape in 2022.  The incident resulted in the loss of five lives.  The trial occupied three weeks, involving complex and technical maritime and oceanographic evidence.  Following the acquittal, a successful costs application resulted in an order that the regulatory pay $150,000 in costs.

 

Horizons Regional Council v Turkington (various between 2021 and 2024)

Successful defence of company, director, employees and clients charged by the regional council for alleged breaches of the Resource Management Act 1991, and the Resource Management (National Environmental Standards for Commercial Forestry) Regulations 2017.  The regional council prosecuted the defendants in relation to three forestry harvest sites, resulting in two jury trials, and an appeal.  All charges were either dismissed before trial, dismissed at trial, or resulted in acquittals.  This including successfully defending a Crown appeal against a dismissal decision: R v Turkington [2025] NZCA 252.

 

WorkSafe v Volcanic Air Safaris & others [2024] NZDC 4119

Acted for defendant helicopter companies charged under the Health and Safety at Work Act 2015 following the eruption of Whakaari (White Island) on 9 December 2019.

 

Rayonier New Zealand Ltd v Canterbury Regional Council [2024] NZHC 1478

Successful appeal on a question of law relating to the regional council’s attempt to introduce forestry rules into its regional plan that were more stringent than Resource Management (National Environmental Standards for Commercial Forestry) Regulations 2017.  The High Court agreed that the regional council had failed to follow the Resource Management Act 1991 legal requirements for greater stringency and had failed to consider and address relevant matters.

 

Cayman Spectrum (NZ) Co v Spark New Zealand [2024] NZHC 107

Acted for plaintiff, and appellant, in a claim alleging equitable dishonest assistance and knowing receipt in relation to the disposition of radio frequency spectrum rights.

 

Appleton v Tasman Cargo Airlines Pty Limited [2023] NZEmpC 191

Acted for a commercial airline pilot in the Employment Court who successfully overturned the ERA’s rejection of his claim against his air operator employer. The Court concluded that the pilot was unjustifiably disadvantaged and unjustifiably dismissed.

 

Lindsay v Director of Civil Aviation 2018-085-000453, District Court, Wellington, 20 October 2021

Successful appeal for a commercial airline pilot, appealing the decision of the Director to impose conditions on the appellant’s medical certificate on the grounds the appellant’s personality traits posed a threat to aviation safety.

 

New Zealand First v Director of Serious Fraud Office [2020] NZHC 2502.

Acted for the applicant, a political party, seeking to injunct the Director of the Serious Fraud Office from making public statements about Director’s electoral fraud criminal investigation in weeks prior to the 2020 general election.

 

 

J v R [2019] NZCA 384.

Acted for the appellant in successfully overturning convictions on charges of serious sexual assaults due to failures of trial counsel to adequately advise and represent the appellant.

 

Financial Market’s Authority v Talbot [2019] NZHC 773.

Acted for the defendant in criminal proceedings brought under the Securities Market Act 1988.

 

Ngai Tai Ki Tamaki v Department of Conservation & Ors [2018] SC 41.

Acted for the second respondent in judicial review proceedings and all appeals, in defence of the Department’s decision to grant tourist concessions on Rangitoto Island.

 

Republic of Kazakhstan v Mega Limited [2016] NZHC 963.

Acted for the respondent opposing the application by the Republic to compel disclosure of user details of cloud storage company to support US based litigation against alleged hackers of Republic’s Government servers. The application was opposed on public interest and human rights grounds.

 

Recent Seminars / Papers

•  Expert Evidence in Health and Safety Cases: Auckland District Law Society October 2020
•  Health and Safety Update: Auckland District Law Society November 2019
•  Courtroom Advocacy – The Essential Skills: Managing the Expected and Unexpected: Auckland District Law Society 2017
•  Rural Law Series: Managing Health and Safety Investigation Post-Incident: Auckland District Law Society August 2016
•  Introduction to the Health and Safety at Work Act 2016: Auckland District Law Society 2016
•  Proceedings before the Coroners’ Courts: New Zealand Law Society 2015

Appointments / Committees

•  Convenor of the Auckland District Law Society Health and Safety at Work Committee 2016 – 2020
•  Guest Lecturer AUT Faculty of Law 2016 – Present
•  Faculty Member of the New Zealand Law Society Litigation Skills Programme 2009 – Present
•  Chair of the Psychoactive Substances Appeal Committee 2015
•  Manukau Crown Prosecution Panel member

Our People

Fletcher Pilditch KC