Matapaki

Richmond Chambers introduces pioneering AI Governance Guide

Richmond Chambers is pleased to announce the launch of our comprehensive AI Governance Guide, a significant step in our ongoing commitment to deploying technology with foresight and integrity.

We believe this initiative positions Richmond Chambers at the forefront of such frameworks, potentially being a first for a barristers’ chambers across the Commonwealth.

To support our members in harnessing AI’s potential, responsibly and ethically, we have developed this Guide. It emphasises that while innovative tools offer new efficiencies, the professional judgment, accountability, and paramount duties of our barristers to clients and the courts remain central.

Josh McBride of Richmond Chambers commented, “The increasing integration of AI into legal practice is undeniable. Our AI Governance Guide is designed to empower our members. It provides a robust framework for making discerning choices about AI utilisation, always prioritising client confidentiality, data security, and our core professional obligations.”

This is an emergent field, and we view our AI Governance Guide as a “living document.” It is intended to evolve, incorporating best practices from the New Zealand Law Society Te Kāhui Ture o Aotearoa, and adapting to new ethical considerations and regulatory developments as they arise. We see this as the commencement of a vital discussion, rather than a definitive statement. Hence we are introducing it on our Matapaki page.

We are proud to share this development and contribute to the broader conversation within the legal community on the thoughtful and ethical engagement with artificial intelligence. While we understand this comprehensive approach to AI governance may be a novel one for a barristers’ set within the Commonwealth, we are always open to learning from others and welcome any information on similar endeavours.

The Richmond Chambers AI Governance Guide is now available here for review and comment.

We encourage you to explore its contents and look forward to the ongoing dialogue as we collectively explore the implications of AI for the future of legal practice.

Share this post with others

Related Posts

Beyond the corporate veil: directors' duties in the construction sector - in conversation with Nick Malarao

Beyond the corporate veil: directors' duties in the construction sector - in conversation with Nick Malarao

The recent High Court judgment in Batley v MacDonald [2025] NZHC 974 offers subtle yet significant insights into directors' duties in the construction sector. Nick Malarao of Richmond Chambers, who acted for the plaintiffs in this proceeding, gives some insights into the case's implications.

When Courts stay out, and when they step in: climate litigation in focus

When Courts stay out, and when they step in: climate litigation in focus

Two recent court decisions have sent New Zealand climate law down sharply different tracks. One defers to expert policy-making. The other reopens the door to private climate claims. Together, they reveal a judiciary that is still calibrating when to step back — and when to step forward.

Q&A with Tim Clarke: Employment Law Specialist on the Government's Health & Safety Reforms

Q&A with Tim Clarke: Employment Law Specialist on the Government's Health & Safety Reforms

Richmond Chambers' employment law specialist Tim Clarke offers his insights on the Government's newly announced health and safety reforms. In this Q&A, Tim examines the potential impacts for New Zealand businesses, landowners, and workers as the ACT-National coalition delivers on its promise to reduce health and safety compliance costs while attempting to maintain workplace safety standards.

Our People